<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Curtin Parloe Films &#187; Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/category/reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk</link>
	<description>Building madness with rudimentary tools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:34:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Canon 550D(Rebel T2i) Digital SLR</title>
		<link>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2010/canon-550drebel-t2i-digital-slr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2010/canon-550drebel-t2i-digital-slr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[550D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5DMkII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital film-making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital SLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T2i]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/?p=278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been shooting a documentary recently, and I decided to get a 550D for that purpose. I'd heard a lot about the camera, and it seemed the most cost-effective way to get cinematic video. It's cheaper and lighter than the Z1, but now shooting has wrapped, how did it perform?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been shooting a documentary recently, and I decided to get a  550D (called a Rebel T2i in the States) for that purpose. I&#8217;d heard a  lot about the camera, and it seemed the most cost-effective way to get  cinematic video. It&#8217;s cheaper and lighter than the Z1, but now shooting  has wrapped, how did it perform?</p>
<p><strong>First impressions</strong><br />
I&#8217;d seen some amazing video from the Canons, so when it came to choosing  a DSLR for video, the Canon 550D was top of the list. It&#8217;s  significantly cheaper than its brothers, the 5DMkII and 7D, yet  comparable with both in terms of video (See <a title="The Great Camera Shootout 2010" href="http://www.zacuto.com/shootout" target="_blank">The Great Camera Shootout 2010</a>).  I&#8217;d read criticisms about it being a bit flimsy and much lighter than  the 7D and 5D, but it outweighs the Minolta X-300, the last SLR I&#8217;d  owned.  I bought it with the Kit lens (EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6), and the  results were pretty good. Of course, I needed a better lens, so I picked  up a 28-105mm/f/3.5-5.6 quite cheaply, and it&#8217;s even better.  While  it&#8217;s not very intuitive, it doesn&#8217;t take long to get to grips with, and  the video settings are simple to customize. The one thing I found  frustrating was that for video the display screen is constantly on, and  the SLR viewfinder is closed, which is a shame. There&#8217;s also no headphone socket, which means you can&#8217;t monitor the sound. Of course, I prefer getting my sound separately anyway, so it&#8217;s less of an issue. There&#8217;s also an external mic socket, although I tend to prefer getting the sound separately anyway.</p>
<p><strong>In Use</strong><br />
The 550D is very useful for shooting  documentary &#8211; it&#8217;s small and unobtrusive, and all but the most nervous  interviewees quickly forget it&#8217;s there. It also minimises the amount of  louts gawping down the lens, which is a blessing. Of course, this is a  double-edged sword, particularly for dramatic shoots, as &#8220;bigger is  better&#8221; seems to be the movie maxim for the general populace. However, a quick  playback of the first take is all most people need to quickly reconsider  &#8211; in fact the presenter of the documentary became the camera&#8217;s  champion, extolling its virtues to all and sundry.</p>
<p>Some things don&#8217;t work as well as others. To someone considering getting this camera with the kit lens &#8211; don&#8217;t. Barrelling became apparent on the wider shots, and it&#8217;s pretty bad. A wide-angle close-up of someone gives a &#8220;fish-eye&#8221; look. It&#8217;s fine if you want that, but if you don&#8217;t you&#8217;re stuck with it. There&#8217;s the rolling shutter issue, which is apparently down to the amount of the camera&#8217;s sensor used for video, which is then compressed before being sent to the SD card. Every third scanline is used vertically, but every pixel horizontally. The result of this is that any very fast movement is too quick for the process, resulting in a tilting effect. The worst thing is that this could quite easily be reduced significantly in firmware by the process only grabbing every other (or third) horizontal pixel, halving the data to work with. On the bright side, this only occurs with high speed movement; for the most part it&#8217;s fine.</p>
<p>Visually, it&#8217;s a treat. The DSLR&#8217;s aesthetic gives video a very professional look, better than any results I&#8217;ve had from a Sony (including the EX3), and has afforded me plenty of compliments (which I do feel a little guilty about). I&#8217;ve found it quite difficult to shoot anything which looks bad, though if you try hard I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s possible. Everything can be adjusted, from the ISO setting to the aperture, to the shutter speed.  There are limitations to this &#8211; the minimum shutter speed is 30fps (the maximum is 4000), the ISO is 100 to 6400 (12800 is only available for stills), and the shutter is dependent upon the lens. It&#8217;s worth mentioning at this point that if you like zooming, you need a lens without aperture correction, because when you zoom in or out, the image changes brightness in steps, accompanied by a little click each time. That said, I hate using zoom anyway, so it wasn&#8217;t an issue.</p>
<p>One thing which can be an issue is the amount of constant shooting you can manage &#8211; the maximum file size for a take is 4 Gb (about 12 and a half minutes) &#8211; but then this is still more than 100ft of 35mm film. The file format is H.264 in a Quicktime wrapper, with a data-rate that requires the use of 60x (category 6) SD cards. Although slower cards can work, they&#8217;re prone to buffer underrun, which stops the recording. The sixes are much better, although it does happen now and again &#8211; the cards work best when filled then re-formatted, without deleting the odd file on the fly, and some people insist on using category 10 cards. The use of h.264 and cards has other ramifications. Like the Red, or other tapeless cameras, data wrangling becomes a priority. Whereas you can grab a DV tape and capture at your leisure, SD cards are by nature re-usable, and without a data wrangler I ended up spending all my time copying from the SD cards to a hard drive (and a secondary hard drive, and a stack of DVDs) to make them ready for the next day. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, it&#8217;s still cheaper and more convenient than something like 35mm, but unless you&#8217;re willing to shell out for a stack of cards for each project, there&#8217;s a lot of laborious file-transfer to do. To illustrate, I have been using six 8Gb cards, which gives me about 2 1/4 hours of video before wrangling; Because the camera records in true HD, there&#8217;s more information to store than with HDV. As I&#8217;ve shot about 250Gb, all told, I would have needed 32 cards, which is heading towards £1000, as opposed to 12 miniDV tapes for about twenty quid. And I still haven&#8217;t backed it all up to 50-odd DVDs yet.</p>
<p>Battery life is better than I expected, especially considering that the screen is on whenever the camera is. I bought a replacement from ebay, and it seems I was lucky, as it performs just as well as Canon&#8217;s own. For a full day&#8217;s shoot, getting through all six cards, I went through three batteries. Obviously mains power would be preferable, but this is a separate accessory which comes with a power adaptor you have to insert into the battery slot. It&#8217;s worth mentioning the overheat problem oft-mentioned on forums &#8211; because the 550D has a plastic chassis as opposed the the metal of the 7D or 5D,  it&#8217;s apparently more prone to overheating. In the instruction manual there is a note to avoid touching the casing if it&#8217;s too hot. I did encounter this, but only once, and in a warm, sunny library with a few redheads, after an hour of shooting. Despite the temperature light flashing annoyingly, I was still able to finish shooting the last 8 minutes of the interview. I then turned the 550D off for a few minutes while we changed the set-up, and it was fine for the rest of the day.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong><br />
I love my 550D. It has its bugbears like any other device, but they&#8217;re negligible enough that shooting with it was an utter joy. I&#8217;d recommend a Canon to anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2010/canon-550drebel-t2i-digital-slr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warhammer 40K &#8211; an overview</title>
		<link>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2010/warhammer-40k-an-overview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2010/warhammer-40k-an-overview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[40k]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games workshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space marines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[table-top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wargame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wargaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warhammer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warhammer 40k]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/?p=238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had some spare time last week, and needing some new dice, I wandered over to Games Workshop. Although they don&#8217;t supply the gel-dice I was after, they did have some lying around unclaimed from previous warhammer tournaments. While I was there, the assistant offered to take me through a demonstration game of Warhammer 40K, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had some spare time last week, and needing some new dice, I wandered over to Games Workshop. Although they don&#8217;t supply the gel-dice I was after, they did have some lying around unclaimed from previous warhammer tournaments. While I was there, the assistant offered to take me through a demonstration game of Warhammer 40K, the futuristic version of the table-top wargame Warhammer, in turn based loosely on Dungeons and Dragons.</p>
<p>The rules themselves are fairly simple, with each player commanding their own army of 28mm high models belonging to a specific race (Space Marines, Orks, Eldar, etc.) with specific objectives in mind (usually the decimation of the opposing army). Each player&#8217;s turn is threefold; move, shoot and assault (hand-to-hand), with the success of all attacks determined by the roll of six-sided-dice (and occasionally a &#8220;scatter&#8221; die which determines artillery inaccuracies). Rolling over a pre-determined amount will result in a kill, although armour allows the defender to deflect the killing shot by rolling a high enough value of their own). Each soldier is part of a squad (usually of five), and one squad may only attack another per round.</p>
<p>In essence, the engagements are simplified versions of encounters in role-playing-games, with the health of each soldier assumed to be one of two states &#8211; alive or dead. This simplification brings the strategy aspects to the fore, and is necessary for the fast-pacing of the game, in which the fate of a squad can be decided in a few seconds &#8211; the sheer number of attacks involved in a single encounter can be mindboggling, with a fistful of dice being rolled at once.</p>
<p>The game I played was the one included in the starter kit <a title="Assault on Black Reach" href="http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/catalog/productDetail.jsp?catId=cat1300032&amp;prodId=prod1570027">Assault on Black Reach</a>, which includes a rulebook and two small armies &#8211; Space Marines and Orks. It was fairly enjoyable, although the role-playing aspects of it seemed somewhat incongruous to me, and £50 is a weighty price-tag for something unless you&#8217;re willing to devote as much time as cash to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2010/warhammer-40k-an-overview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Golden Globe 2010 Movie Results</title>
		<link>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2010/golden-globe-2010-movie-results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2010/golden-globe-2010-movie-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[golden globes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/?p=198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Best Motion Picture &#8211; Drama Avatar Best Motion Picture &#8211; Musical or Comedy The Hangover Best Performance by an Actor in a Motion Picture &#8211; Drama Jeff Bridges for Crazy Heart Best Performance by an Actress in a Motion Picture &#8211; Drama Sandra Bullock for The Blind Side Best Performance by an Actor in a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best Motion Picture &#8211; Drama<br />
<strong>Avatar<br />
</strong><br />
Best Motion Picture &#8211; Musical or Comedy<br />
<strong>The Hangover<br />
</strong><br />
Best Performance by an Actor in a Motion Picture &#8211; Drama<br />
<strong>Jeff Bridges for Crazy Heart<br />
</strong><br />
Best Performance by an Actress in a Motion Picture &#8211; Drama<br />
<strong>Sandra Bullock for The Blind Side<br />
</strong><br />
Best Performance by an Actor in a Motion Picture &#8211; Musical or Comedy<br />
<strong>Robert Downey Jr. for Sherlock Holmes<br />
</strong><br />
Best Performance by an Actress in a Motion Picture &#8211; Musical or Comedy<br />
<strong>Meryl Streep for Julie and Julia<br />
</strong><br />
Best Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role in a Motion Picture<br />
<strong>Christoph Waltz for Inglourious Basterds<br />
</strong><br />
Best Performance by an Actress in a Supporting Role in a Motion Picture<br />
<strong>Mo&#8217;Nique for Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire<br />
</strong><br />
Best Director &#8211; Motion Picture<br />
<strong>James Cameron for Avatar<br />
</strong><br />
Best Screenplay &#8211; Motion Picture<br />
<strong>Jason Reitman, Sheldon Turner for Up In The Air<br />
</strong><br />
Best Original Song &#8211; Motion Picture<br />
<strong>Crazy Heart: T-Bone Burnett, Ryan Bingham(&#8220;The Weary Kind&#8221;)<br />
</strong><br />
Best Original Score &#8211; Motion Picture<strong><br />
Up: Michael Giacchino</strong></p>
<p>Best Animated Film<strong><br />
Up</strong></p>
<p>Best Foreign Language Film<strong><br />
Das weisse Band &#8211; Eine deutsche Kindergeschichte</strong></p>
<p>(data from <a href="http://www.imdb.com">IMDB</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2010/golden-globe-2010-movie-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 in View</title>
		<link>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2010/2009-in-view/</link>
		<comments>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2010/2009-in-view/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[films]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There were quite a few good films released in 2009, amidst the dross. Here&#8217;s my pick of the notables. Bronson Quirky and stupendous. Tom Hardy excels in this operatic biopic of (career criminal) Charles Bronson&#8217;s legend. The Imaginarium Of Doctor Parnassus A true Terry Gilliam film (genius but flawed), and a fitting tribute to Heath [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were quite a few good films released in 2009, amidst the dross. Here&#8217;s my pick of the notables.</p>
<p><strong>Bronson</strong><br />
Quirky and stupendous. Tom Hardy excels in this operatic biopic of (career criminal) Charles Bronson&#8217;s legend.</p>
<p><strong>The Imaginarium Of Doctor Parnassus</strong><br />
A true Terry Gilliam film (genius but flawed), and a fitting tribute to Heath Ledger.</p>
<p><strong>District 9</strong><br />
A well-made allegorical sci-fi movie.</p>
<p><strong>Zombieland</strong><br />
Funny and moving, a film about the long term effects of living with zombies.</p>
<p><strong>Dil Bole Haddippa!</strong><br />
The best Bollywood movie of the year, a comedy about a woman who wants to be a top cricketer.</p>
<p><strong>Moon</strong><br />
Sam Rockwell is excellent as a moon worker facing his own mortality.</p>
<p><strong>Observe And Report</strong><br />
A mall-security version of Taxi Driver. Seriously funny and dark.</p>
<p><strong>In The Loop</strong><br />
A spin-off of The Thick of It, it&#8217;s savage, witty and hilarious.</p>
<p><strong>Looking For Eric</strong><br />
Eric&#8217;s life is a mess until a vision of Eric Cantona comes to help. Fantastic movie.</p>
<p><strong>Star Trek</strong><br />
The scifi franchise reboots with a phenomenal movie.</p>
<p><strong>Honourable mentions:<br />
Awaydays<br />
The Hangover<br />
Surrogates<br />
The Men Who Stare At Goats<br />
Last Chance Harvey<br />
Cloudy With A Chance Of Meatballs<br />
Traitor<br />
Funny People<br />
The Perfect Getaway<br />
Nowhere Boy</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2010/2009-in-view/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Review &#8211; Bolt 3D</title>
		<link>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2009/movie-review-bolt-3d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2009/movie-review-bolt-3d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 14:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/blog/movie-review-bolt-3d/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bolt (John Travolta) is a superdog. He uses his powers to continually protect his owner Penny (Miley Cyrus) from the evil plans of Dr. Calico (Malcolm McDowell). Unfortunately, this is all a deception. Penny is an actress, Bolt isn&#8217;t super, and Calico&#8217;s henchmen are all stuntmen. When ratings slip, the Hollywood studio plans a storyline [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bolt (John Travolta) is a superdog. He uses his powers to continually protect his owner Penny (Miley Cyrus) from the evil plans of Dr. Calico (Malcolm McDowell). Unfortunately, this is all a deception. Penny is an actress, Bolt isn&#8217;t super, and Calico&#8217;s henchmen are all stuntmen. When ratings slip, the Hollywood studio plans a storyline involving Penny&#8217;s kidnap, but thinking it&#8217;s real, Bolt heads off to rescue her, finding himself (through a series of mishaps) in New York. On his quest to find Penny, he teams up with a reluctant cat called Mittens (Susie Essman) and a fanboy hamster called Rhino (Mark Walton).<br />
It&#8217;s another Pixar effort, and another take on the voyage of self-discovery done so well in Toy Story.<br />
Visually it&#8217;s stunning, and in 3D it&#8217;s breathtaking. The script is also excellent, as are the voice performances. I even loved the opening sequence, which really threw me. The problem is that once the story starts proper, it&#8217;s more of the same, really. You know there&#8217;s going to be a flashback to a lonely character&#8217;s happy family past (along with mournful female vocal). You know the hero will have a moment of harsh epiphany and lose faith in himself. Been there, done that. It&#8217;s highly enjoyable, though, and that&#8217;s down mostly to Rhino. Never before has a (couch-potato, nerdy) hamster been so successfully and hilariously brought to the screen. If I see it again, it&#8217;ll be for Rhino.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2009/movie-review-bolt-3d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Review &#8211; Slumdog Millionnaire</title>
		<link>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2009/movie-review-slumdog-millionnaire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2009/movie-review-slumdog-millionnaire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 14:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danny Boyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slumdog Millionnaire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/blog/movie-review-slumdog-millionnaire/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jamal (Dev Patel) goes on &#8220;Who Wants To Be A Millionnaire&#8221; in order to contact his childhood love Latika (Freida Pinto) and ends up (look away now) winning the top prize of 20 million rupees. The film opens with the police interrogating Jamal, thinking he&#8217;s been cheating to reach the 10 million, and the story [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamal (Dev Patel) goes on &#8220;Who Wants To Be A Millionnaire&#8221; in order to contact his childhood love Latika (Freida Pinto) and ends up (look away now) winning the top prize of 20 million rupees. The film opens with the police interrogating Jamal, thinking he&#8217;s been cheating to reach the 10 million, and the story of his childhood is told in flashbacks.<br />
It&#8217;s evocative of earlier Boyle work, with driving music, stylish editing, and studied characters. The acting is great, the cinematography is sumptuous, and the script is deftly written. There are those who accuse Slumdog of being predictable, but this is the nature of the story itself. One of the most interesting things is that Boyle has mixed Hollywood with Bollywood, and created something uniquely unmissable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2009/movie-review-slumdog-millionnaire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Review &#8211; Frost/Nixon</title>
		<link>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2009/movie-review-frostnixon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2009/movie-review-frostnixon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 13:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Langella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Sheen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nixon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/blog/movie-review-frostnixon/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;I am not a crook!&#8221; Well, this film, based on the stage play, pleads otherwise. Frank Langella and Michael Sheen cut heads in the dramatised reworking of the events surrounding the famous interview in which Nixon admits his wrongdoing. I had just seen the original Watergate interview a few days before, and this may have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I am not a crook!&#8221; Well, this film, based on the stage play, pleads otherwise. Frank Langella and Michael Sheen cut heads in the dramatised reworking of the events surrounding the famous interview in which Nixon admits his wrongdoing.<br />
I had just seen the original Watergate interview a few days before, and this may have been a mistake. I noticed when the script strayed from the reality, and I found myself thinking &#8220;he looks quite convincing as Nixon!&#8221; However, I think the real reason was that it was very slow to get going &#8211; not enough happens leading up to the interview itself. That said, the performances and production design were fantastic, and this saved Frost/Nixon. Michael Sheen and Frank Langella had great chemistry, and the ancillary characters were also very well portrayed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2009/movie-review-frostnixon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Review &#8211; Gran Torino</title>
		<link>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2009/movie-review-gran-torino/</link>
		<comments>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2009/movie-review-gran-torino/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 13:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clint Eastwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gran Torino]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clint Eastwood is a grumpy old man. Or at least, he is as Walt in Gran Torino. Starting with the funeral of his wife, we&#8217;re quickly and explicitly put in the picture &#8211; he doesn&#8217;t get on with his family, he has no religion, and he&#8217;s a Korean war veteran. Then there&#8217;s Thao, a teenager [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clint Eastwood is a grumpy old man. Or at least, he is as Walt in Gran Torino. Starting with the funeral of his wife, we&#8217;re quickly and explicitly put in the picture &#8211; he doesn&#8217;t get on with his family, he has no religion, and he&#8217;s a Korean war veteran. Then there&#8217;s Thao, a teenager whose family has just moved in next door. He has no father, and his cousin is trying to get him into a local gang. The initiation for this is to steal a car &#8211; Walt&#8217;s Gran Torino, but Walt scares him off at gunpoint. From then on it&#8217;s a tale about Walt&#8217;s relationship with Thao and the Hmong community, and the animosity of the gang.<br />
It&#8217;s reasonably well scripted, despite the early reliance on heavy handed exposition &#8211; after about half an hour I was hooked &#8211; and there&#8217;s a lot of humour in there. The cinematography brings some beauty to a run-down area, and the performances are pretty good, especially considering that many of the Hmong actors had no film experience. It&#8217;s typical Clint Eastwood fare, and by that I mean &#8220;don&#8217;t expect happy endings in this well-made film&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.curtinparloe.co.uk/2009/movie-review-gran-torino/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
